What if the Competition Is Wrong? How to Avoid the Pitfalls of Competitive Content Research



Competitive research is an essential and essential task in any marketing setting. This is particularly important for digital marketing because the market is always changing and companies are constantly competing with one another to attract customers on different platforms.

In the ideal scenario, performing analysis of the content of your competitors uncovers areas where your online content for your business isn’t as strong as other brands. Based on the information you gather, you can add weak links in your marketing plan and try to beat your competitors by providing superior content. The results will increase the authority of your business in terms of content and keywords rankings, in addition to organic voice shares.

However, research into topics of competition rarely yields clear winners. Your most effective practice techniques must be adequate to search for data from many sources with different quality. You need to know what’s essential to the content and what is just fluffy. In addition, you should know why certain choices are more effective and effective when compared to other options.

All of these factors make conducting research on competitive markets difficult. If you’re not able to identify the most effective options for content and make the correct decisions, you’ll fall into an error that could put you in a worse place than prior to conducting your research, especially when you choose to follow the path of your competitors’ content that is inadequate, ineffective or not suitable for your ideal customer.

In order to ensure your business does not become an unintentional cautionary tale, you must be aware of which competitors to research to find pertinent issues, and evaluate how effective they have implemented their marketing strategy is working.

Identifying competitors: Be aware of paths that are narrow

When we think of competition, whenever we are thinking of rivals, we generally think of direct competitors, those companies that offer similar services or products and compete with the same customers both in brick-and-mortar stores and online such as Patagonia and Prana.

The analysis of what content is being shared by your competitors’ content is an a great way to begin your study on competition analysis, but it is just one part of of digital marketing. It is essential to broaden your perspective and consider the way your content is performing against your SERP competitors as well. This is especially important for smaller businesses that compete with major chains, for example, an independent store in your area , in contrast to Barnes & Noble.

A lot of companies do not realize how important it is to investigating SERP rankings as well as those with organic voice shares within their own particular niche. This is usually because brands don’t directly rival websites that are on high positions. In other instances, businesses don’t have the resources needed to manage each segment simultaneously, and must focus on direct competition and ranking on SERPs.

No matter what the situation regardless of the circumstance conducting study on SERP competitors the disadvantage of your own Direct competitors could be a massive error.

For instance you’re looking for climbing equipment and don’t care about which brand you select. Patagonia and Prana both sell climbing equipment that you can purchase from their websites. Additionally both brands are among the top ten brands on the list for “rock climbing pants” on the first page. However, neither brand is at in its rankings. Patagonia is ranked seventh and Prana is ranked in the eighth spot.

The top spot on organic ranking is taken by a site that is specialized for climbing, which reviews various climbing equipment. The site is rated with an authoritative score of fifty. Prana and Pataongia have authority on domains between 73-85 respectively.

The goal of the search engine remains the identical for every result shown at the top of the page and that is to purchase climbing gear. In this instance, it seems the two companies, Prana nor Patagonia focused on their SERP competitors’ indirect results. If they had, they’d have realized that people who do not care about brands for instance, people who are searching using generic terms, usually buy products based on reviews and recommendations.

Google understands this need of its customers. That is why it is getting more prominent in search results over pages for products.

According to the domain rating of both companies and their vast resources in comparison to a lesser-known site which is more niche, if both companies employed their influencers to write impartial reviews for”rock climber’s pants “rock climbing pants” keyword and they’d be likely to claim the top position without any difficulty.

In reality, these are placed on the back burner , and have to rely on paid ads to keep users’ attention.

The most effective method to analyse content is to use the data gleaned from direct competition and SERP.

Let’s look at an instance. You run a B2B contact center software company for small enterprises and you want to be competitive in the term, “contact center software.” You’re competing against three direct competitors with the same domain ranking, and all three appear on the first page. Other rankings are managed via “best software” listicles.

This split in search intent creates a very fragile ranking environment as well with a fierce competition. If you’d like to have a the chance of being at the top of your list from the search engine, you’ll need to select those content components that are most pertinent to your list of sources as well as direct competition. It is essential to understand which is those who are most pertinent to look at.

How to choose the most effective competitors to assess

Beware of trying to find a balance between SERP analysis and direct competition focus on the competitors who are who are trying to achieve the same goals and have a decent possibility of beating them.

If you’re looking to improve your website’s content every competitor you’re studying must satisfy the following requirements:

  • Your content and services your brand are appropriate and targeted towards your ideal customer
  • The company is following the strategy of content and SEO practices or creating innovative solutions to SEO.
  • The brand is highly visible in the SERPs to show your most relevant keywords.
    • The content on which this brand ranks is relevant to users of your brand, as well as goals for your business.
    • The domain score of your website and credibility on your page is highly competitive. This means that any change you make could trigger the increase in your keyword rankings
  • You’ve got the means to challenge directly the credibility of your brand’s online presence and power

There are some circumstances that make exceptions to these rules for companies, such as those that do not need to have a huge presence on the web due to their dependence on third-party agreements or word-of-mouth for survival, much like government contractors. For typical B2B and B2C businesses, choosing competitors who include this type of information will keep your eye at the right competitors and not just random jokes.

Identifying the areas of pain

If you’ve found your competitors’ names You should know what type of content you must study and find out what makes their approach superior to yours. It’s all about understanding the weaknesses of your brand.

Don’t research or comprehend your personal issues prior to undertaking research into competitive issues is a huge mistake. These pain points can assist you in focusing your study of competitive problems. If you’re not sure the problem you’re trying to fix it’s likely that you’re in the wrong spot when you analyze the content of your competition. If you don’t have a beacon to guide you, it’s simple to copy ideas that you shouldn’t be or to become at a disadvantage with a website which isn’t in line with your goals and natural credibility.

What is the most common areas of pain you must be paying attention to?

In the final analysis, your business goals and the KPIs you set for content will determine which issues you’d like to tackle. Don’t let a slowing conversion rate or a decrease in the number of newsletter subscribers or weak performances of the site determine your next steps.

Let’s suppose that you manage an on-demand streaming site to stream documentaries but are unable to persuade customers to sign for trial subscriptions after having read relevant blogs or studies. You know that your competitor has this type of churn, and you’re looking to study their content and see whether their experiences differ.

Before you look at the competitor’s site and learn why they have trialists it’s important to know the reasons that your users can’t sign up.

In this instance, the most effective option is to conduct user-based research for example:

  • User interviews
  • A/B tests
  • Surveys
  • Usability tests
  • Monitoring heatmaps
  • Net Promoter Score Analysis

Once you’ve identified the causes for why your brand’s performance isn’t as effective and you’ve got an knowledge of the causes and the causes, you can look at ways your competition can solve the issues users have when they use your services.

The trick to determine if the pain point solution offered by an opponent is a good choice for your company is to understand the reasonsit is efficient for competitors. There are many ways to gather this data, such as the awareness process of best practices and putting the concept of your competitor through a series of user research , and then the comparison of options.

The research focuses on a basic principle: competition is adhering to the best practices and are doing everything correctly. However, competitors aren’t always perfect and often don’t provide users with the best user experience or information. What happens when a competition isn’t performing as it should?

What happens if the contest isn’t fair?

Even if a competitor been able to pass your initial test and appears to be a great company to find out about your weaknesses, the initial impressions could be false.

There are many fraudulent marketing strategies that companies might employ that you don’t notice right away, for instance, link building that is illegal and offering users money to write favorable reviews. There are also numerous innocent mistakes that your competitors may make which could harm your website when you decide to use these practices, such as an inability to meet accessibility standards.

Your level of diligence must be in line with the risk you’re willing to take to replicate an idea or plan.

If you are looking for less risky options like the revision of a blog post by a competitor, and etc due diligence is extremely simple. It involves checking the source of post’s keywords, the goal of the article, as well as backlinks.

Some risky options, like revamping your website, or changing the user experience, need more extensive background check.

Here are some warning indicators that could make you think twice about staying away from a competitor, or at the very least, conduct the time to look at their website:

  • Automatization of the content (like scraper blogs) or other indicators that indicate low-quality content
  • Link Clone
  • Guest posting networks as well as other platforms to share content
  • Link farms, private blog networks, or similar techniques of manipulating
  • Multiple domains that contain duplicate content
  • Reviews that are paid by users, or similar manipulative techniques
  • Social media manipulation
  • Comment spam
  • Fraudulent cookies
  • Hidden text

How can you tell if your competing against the wrong people

To avoid using erroneous, high-risk ideas It is advised to make sure you be sure to ask the following four concerns:

  1. Does the content used by the brand comply with SEO and content strategy and UX standards?
  2. Does the content have worth? How do you convey its worth to users?
  3. You can tell us what you feel the reasons why the company behind this material?
  4. If you were to adopt the same (or similar) idea, how would your brand new website and its content be improved for the user experience?

The four questions are an assessment tool to ensure that you’re not inventing new concepts. They force you to think about the motives that drive a competitor’s choices, how users react and the consequences of copying their actions. While this strategy isn’t required for every advantage you can get from competitors but it’s a great option when you’re considering major adjustments that can tip KPIs toward success or failure.

Don’t repeat the same mistakes and fall into the risks

Conducting research into markets that are competitive is a crucial marketing tactic that is extremely valuable to take your time making sure you’re looking at the legitimate competitors. Although it’s tempting to skip research, and believe that your competition is aware of how they’re doing, based on research results or general perceptions that they aren’t the experts you think you are, and you’ll be wasting your money, time and customers in a false belief.

Here’s a simple refresher on what should do to ensure that you’re prepared for competitive research , and to be sure you don’t implement bad concepts:

  • Find SERP’s amalgamation with direct competitors, with relevant content. All of them are striving to accomplish the same goal and targeting the same kind of user.
  • Find the weak points of your brand’s image and research the strategies of competitors to tackle similar issues.
  • Do some background research on the content choices of your competitors to make sure they’re adhering to their strategy regarding content. SEO, and UX best practices.


Next Post